Return to

Newsletter

Sign up and stay in-the-know about The Crowd & The Cloud and the world of citizen science.
* indicates required

#CrowdCloudLIVE After each episode's WORLD premiere in April, show host, producer, and people seen on the show participated in post-premiere roundtable discussions. Viewers like you listened in, asked questions, and were able to dive deeper into the power of Citizen Science.

Watch the recorded Facebook Live events now. Discover more about how Citizen Science is revolutionizing the ways we gather, analyze, and utilize the data that fuels scientific research, discovery, and community action.

Find your local station and showtimes here, or go to:
Aptonline.org

The Bucket Brigade and Peer Review
Public Justice On "Data Censorship Statutes"

CROWD & CLOUD:
Public Justice on so-called “Ag Gag” laws

As Deb Thomas says in the conclusion of C&C program 2, citizen science data collection has become more problematic in Wyoming since her initial work on the “Warning Signs” report. The state legislature passed a law in 2015 and a revised law in 2016 restricting access to gather air and water quality data, citing concerns about trespassing on private lands. The restrictions applied not just to environmental NGOs and regular citizens, but also members of the media. Accordingly THE CROWD & THE CLOUD consulted with Public Justice, one of the legal entities that brought suit in the matter, for help in understanding the background of the cases. Here is their overview of the situation, not just in Wyoming but also in other states.

You can read their full statement at:
https://www.publicjustice.net/leading-fight-ag-gag-laws/

Leading the Fight Against “Ag Gag” Laws

“In recent years, more and more state legislatures have – at the urging of lobbyists representing factory farm operations and industrial food producers – taken up “Ag Gag” laws that shroud mega-farms in secrecy and make holding them accountable for pollution, unsafe working conditions and animal abuse difficult, if not impossible.

At Public Justice, we believe everyone has the right to know where their food comes from, how it is produced, and the health and environmental ramifications of factory farming. We also believe taxpayers have a right to know if, and how, public lands such as national parks are being polluted in illegal and destructive ways. That’s why our Food Project has led the way in challenging these laws in court.

We’re currently challenging four states’ laws and actively looking at potential challenges to other, recently passed measures in states across the country. In addition to fighting Ag Gag laws in court, we’re also committed to educating the public about why these laws harm us all (through partnerships with innovative programs and storytellers like The Crowd & The Cloud), and to mobilizing opposition when they are introduced in state legislatures.
Here’s a snapshot of our work in states across the country:

Here’s a snapshot of our work in states across the country:
Idaho: Working with a coalition of groups, we helped secure the very first court decision declaring an Ag Gag law unconstitutional. Idaho’s statute made it a crime for employees to go undercover at a factory farm and report violations taking place at those facilities. The district court agreed with our argument that the state’s law blatantly violated the First Amendment and the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The state has appealed our victory, and we are helping defend the decision before the Ninth Circuit. The argument to uphold this first-of-its-kind win will be on May 12th 2017 in Seattle.

Wyoming: When Wyoming first passed its Ag-Gag law the state made it a crime to tell the government about pollution. After a federal district court indicated the law was shockingly unconstitutional, state lawmakers rewrote the statute with only the most superficial of changes. In its current iteration, Wyoming’s law makes it a crime to accidentally touch private property in the process of gathering data on public or private land, but only if the data gathered is the exact information the state requires to evaluate pollution. Preventing people from petitioning their government for environmental protections remains unconstitutional. Public Justice is proud to be lead counsel appealing the lower court’s ruling. Our Food Project attorneys will present oral arguments before the 10th Circuit on May 8th in Denver.

North Carolina: We’re leading the challenge to the state’s law – vetoed by then-Governor Pat McCroy but pushed through by legislators who overrode the Governor’s action – which makes it illegal to collect information about an employer or private property owner (such as a factory farm operation) and to provide that information to the public, including by turning it over to federal officials, the press, or lawmakers. We’ll be in district court on April 4th, fighting the state’s attempt to have our challenge dismissed.

Utah: We’ve submitted amicus briefs supporting a legal challenge to the state’s law, which mirrors the bill we’ve successfully challenged in Idaho. Our allies leading the challenge successfully defeated the state’s motion to throw out the case. We anticipate the district court will soon rule on the law’s constitutionality.

With each win against these dangerous bills, we send a clear message to other state legislatures and Governors that these bans cannot survive legal scrutiny and are not supported by the public. Working with coalition partners we have identified other, similar laws. We’re determined to fight for transparency and defend everyone’s right to know the truth about how factory farms, industrial polluters – and their corporate lobbyists – operate.

Stay up to date by signing up for our email list on our work to defeat these dangerous laws – and other Public Justice cases. We’ll send you occasional updates and information about how you can take action, too.

Support our work: Make a tax-deductible gift to Public Justice’s Food Project today to take on factory farm lobbyists and protect citizens’ rights to know about our food supply and public lands.”

randomness